RAMS NL-2315: Podcast studio mixer hums
Demo template. A demo template, not professional safety advice. A competent person must check every RAMS against the site, the work and the law where it happens before anyone relies on it.
Generated from the record, reviewed by Sam Okafor
- Client
- Quillmark Publishing
- Site
- Seattle studio, Podcast studio
- When
- Wed 7 Oct
- Crew
- Tessa Quinn
- For
- QM-1142 · visit ready
- Generated
- 28 Sep 2026, 08:15
The work, and what the record says
- Fault-find the audio · Listed on the job
- Northlight's survey (Podcast studio, 9 Jul 2026, Tessa Quinn): ceiling 3 m
- Northlight's survey (Podcast studio, 9 Jul 2026, Tessa Quinn): acoustic panels on the ceiling; nothing is fixed above head height for this job
- Northlight's survey (Podcast studio, 9 Jul 2026, Tessa Quinn): a working studio, booked in slots
Risk after controls
Likelihood up, 1 rare to 5 almost certainSeverity across, 1 to 5
Low, 1 to 4Medium, 5 to 12High, 15 and above
Before controls: 0 high, 3 medium, 0 low.
Hazards and controls
H1Working in an occupied space
A working studio, booked in slots: staff and visitors pass close to the work.
- Who might be harmed
- Staff and visitors
- Controls
- Barriers and signs round the work area
- Noisy work and drilling booked with the site contact, out of hours where possible
- Corridors and doors kept clear; cables never left across a walkway
Source: Northlight's survey (Podcast studio, 9 Jul 2026, Tessa Quinn): a working studio, booked in slots
Before Medium · 3 × 3After Low · 1 × 3H2Loud sound while testing audio
Fault-finding a mixer can produce sudden loud feedback or hum.
- Who might be harmed
- The crew; Staff and visitors
- Controls
- Outputs muted before connecting; levels brought up slowly
- Headphones kept off while the level is unknown
- The studio booked empty while testing
Source: Task: fault-find the audio (listed on the job)
Before Medium · 2 × 3After Low · 1 × 2H3Working alone
One person on the visit: no one to raise the alarm after a fall or a shock.
- Who might be harmed
- The crew member
- Controls
- Check-in calls with Northlight at arrival, midday and departure
- The client's site contact knows where the work is
- No work at height alone
Source: The visit books one person
Before Medium · 2 × 4After Low · 1 × 4
Method statement
- Before the visit. This RAMS approved and briefed to the crew; badges, induction and access confirmed; kit reserved and loaded.
- Arrive and sign in. Sign in with Quillmark Publishing's site contact; agree the work area and any times to avoid. (H1)
- Set up the work area. Barriers and signs round the area; floor protection where kit is moved. (H1)
- Find the hum. Outputs muted, then each source brought up in turn until the fault shows. (H2)
- Clear up and hand back. Waste and packaging removed; the area handed back to the site contact; the as-built recorded on the job.
Personal protective equipment
- Safety boots
Emergency arrangements
- No first aider on the crew: use the site's first aiders, named at induction
- The site's fire alarm, assembly point and first aiders: confirmed at induction (not in the record)
- Emergency services: 911
- Report any incident to Quillmark Publishing's site contact and to Northlight's safety lead the same day
Competence: the crew's certifications
The work needs no certification beyond the site's own induction.
Certifications from Northlight's crew record (Tessa Quinn), checked on the last day of the work. 9 kinds are tracked, from CTS to site safety cards.
Review and sign-off
| Briefed to | Role | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tessa Quinn | Installer |